Models / Google/ Gemini 2.5 Pro

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Google · released Jun 17, 2025

Input: text, images, audio, video and documents. Output: text.InputOutput
Type
Proprietary
Input
$1.25
Output
$10.00
Cached
Not published

List price · per 1M tokens · Google AI at 1M context · source ↗ · a reseller below undercuts it; the table carries the spread

Our take

Written Aug 2, 2026

Gemini 2.5 Pro is Google's flagship reasoning model that accepts text, images, files, audio and video in a single request, with a one-million-token limit. It offers tiered throughput pricing and scores well across coding, reasoning and creative writing benchmarks, though it is available only through Google's hosted services.

Who should pick it

Choose this for long-context multimodal work where you need to feed documents, video or audio into the same model, or for latency-sensitive coding and reasoning where 94.5–99 tokens per second matters. The slowest tier suits budget-sensitive batch work. Skip it if you need to self-host, fine-tune, or avoid proprietary lock-in; also skip if web-development coding is your main need, where it lags its own general coding score by a wide margin.

The case for it

  • Broad multimodal input coverage: text, images, files, audio and video in a single model.
  • One-million-token request limit, disclosed as 1,048,576 tokens.
  • Strong measured performance across diverse tasks: Arena Coding 1465.2, Arena Hard Prompts 1458.3, Arena Creative Writing 1444.3 — all within a 21-point spread suggesting balanced capability.
  • Tiered pricing allows throughput-cost tradeoff: the same mid-tier rate is available at 99, 96 or 94.5 tokens per second, or half the price at 26–85 tokens per second.

The case against it

  • Proprietary lock-in with no local or fine-tuning path: weights are proprietary, licence undisclosed, parameter count unpublished.
  • Premium tier pricing is steep: 3.6 times the entry input price and 3.6 times the entry output price.
  • Web development coding lags other coding measures: Arena Code (WebDev) 1224.2 versus Arena Coding 1465.2, a 241-point gap.
00

How good is it?

IntelligencePuzzles, maths, exam questions

3 of 5

Arena Text (overall)39th of 143 · 1445.5

Arena Hard Prompts 49th of 143Arena Maths 39th of 139

CodingWriting and fixing code on its own

3 of 5

Arena Coding58th of 143 · 1465.2

Arena Code (WebDev) 71st of 74LiveCodeBench 5th of 14

AgenticPlanning, calling tools, staying on task

Scored, not ratedSWE-bench Verified · 24th of 39 · 53.6via mini-SWE-agent

Gemini 2.5 Pro is not on Arena Agent (IPS), which is where the rating would come from, so there is no rating here. It is on SWE-bench Verified, in 24th of 39 with 53.6.

WritingWe do not rate this

Scored, not ratedThe placings are on the right.

Two boards come close and neither tests writing: Arena Creative Writing asks people which of two replies they prefer, and LiveBench Language tests whether a model understood a passage. So we show where Gemini 2.5 Pro placed and give it no mark out of five.

Arena Creative Writing 24th of 143 · 1444.1
Also scored, on boards we give no mark for
Arena Instruction Following 37th of 143

These tests check whether a model follows instructions — a precondition for all the work above, but not a measure of how well that work is done, which is why they get no rating.

Every published score for this model9 scoresEvery figure we hold, from 9 boards, with who ran it and a link to the source — including the boards no rating above is built on.
84.3independentsource ↗
1465.2independentsource ↗
1458.2independentsource ↗
1440.9independentsource ↗
1445.5independentsource ↗
1224.2independentsource ↗
53.6via mini-SWE-agentindependentsource ↗
01

Or rent it from someone else

Cheapest published offer

The lab is also the cheapest we hold. The strip above and this offer are the same one, so nothing on this page undercuts Google AI on 1M of context.

per 1M tokens
$1.25 in / $10.00 out
Context served
1M
Throughput
Not measured
Current provider offers with price, context and prompt-privacy answers
ProviderIn / out per 1M tokensContextThroughputTrains on promptsLogs promptsZero retention
Google AI Studioflex tier$0.63 / $5.001M20 tok/sNoYes55 daysUnknown
Google Vertex AIglobal$0.63 / $5.001M85 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Google AI$1.25 / $10.001M66K outnot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown
OpenRouter$1.25 / $10.001Mnot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown
Google Vertex AIus$1.25 / $10.001M104 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Google AI Studio$1.25 / $10.001M81 tok/sNoYes55 daysUnknown
Google Vertex AIeu$1.25 / $10.001M99 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
DeepInfra$1.25 / $10.001Mnot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown
Google AI Studiopriority tier$2.25 / $18.001Mnot measuredNoYes55 daysUnknown

Across the 9 listings we hold: 6 say they do not train on prompts, 0 say they do and 3 do not say. 3 appear in the zero-retention registry we check; the rest are unknown to us rather than confirmed either way.

What each host's API supports

From the parameter list each endpoint publishes. Streaming is omitted: nothing we hold reports it, for any model.

Supported
Not supported
Not published
host gave no parameter list
API features per host
ProviderTool callingJSON outputStrict schema
Google AI Studioflex
Google Vertex AIglobal
Google AI
OpenRouter
Google Vertex AIus
Google AI Studio
Google Vertex AIeu
DeepInfra
Google AI Studiopriority

Tool calling: 7 of 9 listings say yes, 2 publish no parameter list. JSON output: 7 of 9 listings say yes, 2 publish no parameter list. Strict schema: 7 of 9 listings say yes, 2 publish no parameter list.

02

Models people weigh against Gemini 2.5 Pro

03

When we formed this view

Dates behind this page

Aug 3, 2026BenchmarkScored 84.3 on LiveCodeBenchleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1465.2 on Arena Codingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1444.1 on Arena Creative Writingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1458.2 on Arena Hard Promptsleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1439.2 on Arena Instruction Followingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1440.9 on Arena Mathsleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1445.5 on Arena Text (overall)leaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1224.2 on Arena Code (WebDev)leaderboard
Jul 29, 2026Price changeGoogle cut Gemini 2.5 Pro pricing by 50%input −50% ($1.25 → $0.63 per 1M tokens); output −50% ($10.00 → $5.00 per 1M tokens)
Jul 26, 2026ListedListed on LLMapfirst indexed by our pipeline

Prices last checked 9d ago

What we do not know about this model yet

  • 2 of 9 listings publish no parameter list, so what their API accepts is unknown to us.
  • Nothing we hold says whether an endpoint streams, so we do not show it either way.
  • 3 of 9 listings do not say whether they train on prompts.
04

Licence and identifiers

What the licence allowsWe hold no licence record for this model. Inside are the identifiers you need to pull it — its Hugging Face repo where we have one, our slug and a machine-readable card.

Licence

Commercial API terms. We hold no licence record for this model, so there is nothing to summarise here.

Identifiers

Modality record
text+image+file+audio+video->text
Catalogue slug
google-gemini-2-5-pro

Machine-readable model card (omc.json) →

Something wrong on this page? Tell us