Models / Meta/ Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

Meta · released Jul 16, 2024 · meta-llama/Meta-Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct

Input: text. Output: text.InputOutput
Type
Open weightsLlama 3.1 Community License
Params
70.6B
Context
131K

about 98K words of context · download allowed, licence restricts use

Our take

Written Aug 3, 2026

Llama 3.1 is a 70.6-billion-parameter text model from Meta, released in 2024 with a restricted community licence. It handles long requests and is widely available from hosts, though its benchmark scores vary sharply by task and its licence is less flexible than truly open alternatives.

Who should pick it

Pick this for long-context text work up to 131,072 tokens, or when you need Llama-ecosystem access with broad provider choice. Use it if you want the cheapest rate among its own five tracked offers, which is half the price of the most expensive one. Skip it if you need graduate-level science reasoning, truly permissive licensing, or consistent quality across every task type.

The case for it

  • Broad provider availability: five tracked offers with the cheapest rate exactly half the price of the most expensive.
  • Strong measured instruction-following capability, at 86.7% on IFEval.
  • Highest measured throughput among its own endpoints, at 27 tokens per second on CoreWeave versus 17–23 elsewhere.

The case against it

  • Weak on graduate-level reasoning and science: 14.2% on GPQA Diamond, its lowest benchmark score.
  • Arena performance varies widely by task type, with a 75.87-point spread from its best task to its worst.
  • Restricted licence limits flexibility compared with truly permissive alternatives such as Apache 2.0 or MIT models.
00

How good is it?

IntelligencePuzzles, maths, exam questions

1 of 5

Arena Text (overall)126th of 143 · 1293.3

Arena Hard Prompts 128th of 143Arena Maths 122nd of 139MMLU-Pro 4th of 16GPQA Diamond 7th of 16

CodingWriting and fixing code on its own

1 of 5

Arena Coding125th of 143 · 1333.1

Arena Coding is the only board that has scored it for this.

AgenticPlanning, calling tools, staying on task

not measured

Nobody we watch has scored Llama 3.1 70B Instruct for this. We would take the rating from Arena Agent (IPS).

WritingWe do not rate this

Scored, not ratedThe placings are on the right.

Two boards come close and neither tests writing: Arena Creative Writing asks people which of two replies they prefer, and LiveBench Language tests whether a model understood a passage. So we show where Llama 3.1 70B Instruct placed and give it no mark out of five.

Arena Creative Writing 125th of 143 · 1257.2
Also scored, on boards we give no mark for
Arena Instruction Following 127th of 143IFEval 2nd of 16

These tests check whether a model follows instructions — a precondition for all the work above, but not a measure of how well that work is done, which is why they get no rating.

Every published score for this model9 scoresEvery figure we hold, from 9 boards, with who ran it and a link to the source — including the boards no rating above is built on.
GPQA Diamondreasoning
14.2independentsource ↗
IFEvalchat
86.7independentsource ↗
1333.1independentsource ↗
1298.3independentsource ↗
1269.1independentsource ↗
1293.3independentsource ↗
MMLU-Proreasoning
47.9independentsource ↗
01

Can you run it yourself?

Fits in memory
weights load entirely on the card
Spills to system RAM
some weights offload; much slower
Too large
will not load even with offload
est
size is calculated; the verdict could change by 10%
A card many people ownToo large

GeForce RTX 4090 · 24 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M44.5 / 24 GBest
Usable contextNot calculated for spilled setups
Decode speedNot estimated for spilled setups

Too large for this card. The weights do not fit even with part of them offloaded to system memory.

One step upToo large

Apple M1 Pro (16-core GPU) · 32 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M44.5 / 32 GBest
Usable contextNot calculated for spilled setups
Decode speedNot estimated for spilled setups

Too large for this card. The weights do not fit even with part of them offloaded to system memory.

On a MacFits in memoryest

Apple M1 Max (32-core GPU) · 64 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M44.5 / 64 GBest
Spare memory0.6 GB spare
Usable context4K of 131K
Decode speed7 tok/sest

Borderline fit on an estimated size. It leaves 0.6 GB spare on a size we calculated rather than measured, and a 10% error either way would change the answer.

Your hardware
Checking your profile…

Memory use by level

Against a 24 GB card.

Q4_K_M
recommended
44.5 GBest
Too large
Q5_K_M
52.2 GBest
Too large
Q8_0
78 GBest
Too large

All 3 sizes here are calculated, not measured. We hold no measured file for this model, so each size comes from the parameter count and every verdict above inherits that uncertainty.

Check against your own machine → · All 71 devices, with every size →

02

Or rent it from someone else

Cheapest published offer

Cheapest of 5 live listings. Picked at the widest standard context we hold, within one quantisation slice, so the numbers beside it are a price one host actually charges.

per 1M tokens
$0.40 in / $0.40 out
Context served
131K
Throughput
Not measured
Current provider offers with price, context and prompt-privacy answers
ProviderIn / out per 1M tokensContextThroughputTrains on promptsLogs promptsZero retention
OpenRouter$0.40 / $0.40131Knot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown
DeepInfrafp8$0.40 / $0.40131K23 tok/sNoNoUnknown
DeepInfraturbo tierfp8$0.40 / $0.40131K19 tok/sNoNoUnknown
Amazon Bedrock$0.72 / $0.72131K21 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
CoreWeavebf16$0.80 / $0.80128K27 tok/sNoNoConfirmed

Across the 5 listings we hold: 4 say they do not train on prompts, 0 say they do and 1 do not say. 2 appear in the zero-retention registry we check; the rest are unknown to us rather than confirmed either way.

What each host's API supports

From the parameter list each endpoint publishes. Streaming is omitted: nothing we hold reports it, for any model.

Supported
Not supported
Not published
host gave no parameter list
API features per host
ProviderTool callingJSON outputStrict schema
OpenRouter
DeepInfrafp8
DeepInfraturbo · fp8
Amazon Bedrock
CoreWeavebf16

Tool calling: 3 of 5 listings say yes, 2 say no. JSON output: 4 of 5 listings say yes, 1 says no. Strict schema: 4 of 5 listings say yes, 1 says no.

03

Models people weigh against Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

04

When we formed this view

Dates behind this page

Aug 3, 2026BenchmarkScored 14.2 on GPQA Diamondleaderboard
Aug 3, 2026BenchmarkScored 86.7 on IFEvalleaderboard
Aug 3, 2026BenchmarkScored 47.9 on MMLU-Proleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1333.1 on Arena Codingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1257.2 on Arena Creative Writingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1298.3 on Arena Hard Promptsleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1272.4 on Arena Instruction Followingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1269.1 on Arena Mathsleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1293.3 on Arena Text (overall)leaderboard
Jul 26, 2026ListedListed on LLMapfirst indexed by our pipeline

Prices last checked 38h ago

What we do not know about this model yet

  • We hold no measured file for it, so all 3 sizes on this page are calculated from the parameter count.
  • Nothing we hold says whether an endpoint streams, so we do not show it either way.
  • 1 of 5 listings do not say whether they train on prompts.
05

Licence and identifiers

What the licence allowsLlama 3.1 Community License, what it allows commercially, and the identifiers you need to pull this model — its Hugging Face repo, our slug and a machine-readable card.

Licence

Llama 3.1 Community License

restricted_openCommercial use allowed

Commercial use below 700M MAU. Notably allows using outputs to improve other models, which earlier Llama licenses banned. Derivative names must start with "Llama".

Identifiers

Modality record
text->text
Catalogue slug
meta-llama-llama-3-1-70b-instruct

Machine-readable model card (omc.json) →

Something wrong on this page? Tell us