Models / Mistral AI/ Mistral Large

Mistral Large

Mistral AI · released Feb 26, 2024

Input: text and documents. Output: text.InputOutput
Type
Proprietary
Input
$2.00
Output
$6.00
Cached
$0.20

List price · per 1M tokens · Mistral AI at 128K context · source ↗

Our take

Written Aug 3, 2026

Mistral Large is a hosted-only text model from Mistral AI that handles up to 128,000 tokens in a single request. It launched in early 2024 with broad benchmark coverage and strong instruction-following scores, though its reasoning on graduate-level problems is weak.

Who should pick it

Pick this for long-document processing where a 128,000-token request limit matters, or for instruction-following tasks where its 84% score on that benchmark is relevant. Use it if you want predictable pricing across providers. Skip it if you need graduate-level reasoning, if you want to self-host, or if you need price competition between hosts to drive costs down.

The case for it

  • Strong instruction-following performance, with an IFEval score of 84%.
  • Broad benchmark coverage across six Arena categories, with ratings from 1210.71 to 1294.90.
  • Identical pricing across both tracked providers, so costs are predictable.

The case against it

  • Weak graduate-level reasoning: 24.9% on GPQA Diamond, near the random baseline for this benchmark.
  • MMLU-Pro score of 50.7% lags for a flagship-class model on professional and graduate knowledge.
  • Low measured throughput of 9 tokens per second on Mistral's own endpoint, with no price competition between its two offers.
00

How good is it?

IntelligencePuzzles, maths, exam questions

1 of 5

Arena Text (overall)137th of 143 · 1242

Arena Hard Prompts 136th of 143Arena Maths 130th of 139GPQA Diamond 1st of 16MMLU-Pro 2nd of 16

CodingWriting and fixing code on its own

1 of 5

Arena Coding135th of 143 · 1294.9

Arena Coding is the only board that has scored it for this.

AgenticPlanning, calling tools, staying on task

not measured

Nobody we watch has scored Mistral Large for this. We would take the rating from Arena Agent (IPS).

WritingWe do not rate this

Scored, not ratedThe placings are on the right.

Two boards come close and neither tests writing: Arena Creative Writing asks people which of two replies they prefer, and LiveBench Language tests whether a model understood a passage. So we show where Mistral Large placed and give it no mark out of five.

Arena Creative Writing 134th of 143 · 1210.7
Also scored, on boards we give no mark for
Arena Instruction Following 136th of 143IFEval 4th of 16

These tests check whether a model follows instructions — a precondition for all the work above, but not a measure of how well that work is done, which is why they get no rating.

Every published score for this model9 scoresEvery figure we hold, from 9 boards, with who ran it and a link to the source — including the boards no rating above is built on.
GPQA Diamondreasoning
24.9independentsource ↗
IFEvalchat
84independentsource ↗
1294.9independentsource ↗
1261.4independentsource ↗
1244.3independentsource ↗
MMLU-Proreasoning
50.7independentsource ↗
01

Or rent it from someone else

Cheapest published offer

Why this differs from the header. The strip above quotes Mistral AI's own list price. This is the cheapest live offer at the widest standard context we hold, whoever is serving it — a reseller undercutting a lab is ordinary commerce, not an error.

per 1M tokens
$2.00 in / $6.00 out
Context served
128K
Throughput
Not measured
Current provider offers with price, context and prompt-privacy answers
ProviderIn / out per 1M tokensContextThroughputTrains on promptsLogs promptsZero retention
OpenRouter$2.00 / $6.00128Knot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown
Mistral AI$2.00 / $6.00128K4 tok/sNoYes30 daysUnknown

Across the 2 listings we hold: 1 say they do not train on prompts, 0 say they do and 1 do not say. 0 appear in the zero-retention registry we check; the rest are unknown to us rather than confirmed either way.

What each host's API supports

From the parameter list each endpoint publishes. Streaming is omitted: nothing we hold reports it, for any model.

Supported
Not supported
Not published
host gave no parameter list
API features per host
ProviderTool callingJSON outputStrict schema
OpenRouter
Mistral AI

Tool calling: 2 of 2 listings say yes. JSON output: 2 of 2 listings say yes. Strict schema: 2 of 2 listings say yes.

02

Models people weigh against Mistral Large

03

When we formed this view

Dates behind this page

Aug 3, 2026BenchmarkScored 24.9 on GPQA Diamondleaderboard
Aug 3, 2026BenchmarkScored 84 on IFEvalleaderboard
Aug 3, 2026BenchmarkScored 50.7 on MMLU-Proleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1294.9 on Arena Codingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1210.7 on Arena Creative Writingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1261.4 on Arena Hard Promptsleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1236.7 on Arena Instruction Followingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1244.3 on Arena Mathsleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1242 on Arena Text (overall)leaderboard
Jul 27, 2026Benchmark updatemistral-large-2402 enters LMArena at 1242 Elo62436 votes

Prices last checked 9d ago

What we do not know about this model yet

  • Nothing we hold says whether an endpoint streams, so we do not show it either way.
  • 1 of 2 listings do not say whether they train on prompts.
04

Licence and identifiers

What the licence allowsWe hold no licence record for this model. Inside are the identifiers you need to pull it — its Hugging Face repo where we have one, our slug and a machine-readable card.

Licence

Commercial API terms. We hold no licence record for this model, so there is nothing to summarise here.

Identifiers

Modality record
text+file->text
Catalogue slug
mistralai-mistral-large

Machine-readable model card (omc.json) →

Something wrong on this page? Tell us