Models / Mistral AI/ Mistral Small 3.1 24B

Mistral Small 3.1 24B

Mistral AI · released Mar 11, 2025 · mistralai/Mistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-2503

Input: text and images. Output: text.InputOutput
Type
Open weightsApache License 2.0
Params
24B
Context
128K

about 96K words of context

Our take

Written Aug 1, 2026

Mistral Small 3.1 is a 24-billion-parameter text-and-image model released in 2025 with a permissive Apache licence. It handles up to 128,000 tokens in a single request and shows measured coding strength across six Arena benchmarks, making it a mid-tier generalist for teams that want open-weight flexibility.

Who should pick it

Pick this for budget-conscious hosted deployment where both providers charge the same rate, or for coding tasks where it scores highest among its own measured skills. Use it for multimodal text-and-image workflows under Apache 2.0 terms, or long-context work up to 128,000 tokens. Skip it if you need measured vision quality scores, if creative writing quality is critical, or if you want the efficiency of a mixture-of-experts architecture.

The case for it

  • Broad benchmark coverage with coding as the standout skill: its Arena Coding score is over 90 points higher than its own Creative Writing score.
  • Truly permissive Apache 2.0 licence allows commercial use, fine-tuning and redistribution.
  • 128,000-token request limit is large for a 24-billion-parameter model.
  • Identical pricing across both tracked providers, so there is no markup arbitrage.

The case against it

  • OpenRouter throughput is undisclosed; only Cloudflare shows a measured 39 tokens per second.
  • Creative writing is the lowest of its six own Arena scores, trailing its coding score by over 90 points.
  • Dense architecture with 24 billion total parameters and no verified active-parameter count — likely full 24 billion active per token, which may limit local efficiency compared with mixture-of-experts alternatives.
00

How good is it?

IntelligencePuzzles, maths, exam questions

1 of 5

Arena Text (overall)124th of 143 · 1303.4

Arena Hard Prompts 120th of 143Arena Maths 118th of 139

CodingWriting and fixing code on its own

1.5 of 5

Arena Coding114th of 143 · 1361.8

Arena Coding is the only board that has scored it for this.

AgenticPlanning, calling tools, staying on task

not measured

Nobody we watch has scored Mistral Small 3.1 24B for this. We would take the rating from Arena Agent (IPS).

WritingWe do not rate this

Scored, not ratedThe placings are on the right.

Two boards come close and neither tests writing: Arena Creative Writing asks people which of two replies they prefer, and LiveBench Language tests whether a model understood a passage. So we show where Mistral Small 3.1 24B placed and give it no mark out of five.

Arena Creative Writing 120th of 143 · 1271.1
Also scored, on boards we give no mark for
Arena Instruction Following 117th of 143

These tests check whether a model follows instructions — a precondition for all the work above, but not a measure of how well that work is done, which is why they get no rating.

Every published score for this model6 scoresEvery figure we hold, from 6 boards, with who ran it and a link to the source — including the boards no rating above is built on.
1361.8independentsource ↗
1319independentsource ↗
1277.9independentsource ↗
1303.4independentsource ↗
01

Can you run it yourself?

Fits in memory
weights load entirely on the card
Spills to system RAM
some weights offload; much slower
Too large
will not load even with offload
est
size is calculated; the verdict could change by 10%

Comfortable fit

A card many people ownFits in memory

GeForce RTX 4090 · 24 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M15.1 / 24 GBest
Spare memory5.7 GB spare
Usable context33K of 128K
Decode speed55 tok/sest

Room to spare. 5.7 GB spare means a 10% error in the size would not change the answer.

One step upFits in memory

GeForce RTX 5090 · 32 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M15.1 / 32 GBest
Spare memory13.7 GB spare
Usable context66K of 128K
Decode speed99 tok/sest

Room to spare. 13.7 GB spare means a 10% error in the size would not change the answer.

On a MacFits in memoryest

Apple M2 (10-core GPU) · 24 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M15.1 / 24 GBest
Spare memory0.9 GB spare
Usable context4K of 128K
Decode speed5 tok/sest

Borderline fit on an estimated size. It leaves 0.9 GB spare on a size we calculated rather than measured, and a 10% error either way would change the answer.

Your hardware
Checking your profile…

Memory use by level

Against a 24 GB card.

Q4_K_M
recommended
15.1 GBest
Fits in memory
Q5_K_M
17.8 GBest
Fits in memory
Q8_0
26.5 GBest
Spills to system RAM

All 3 sizes here are calculated, not measured. We hold no measured file for this model, so each size comes from the parameter count and every verdict above inherits that uncertainty.

Check against your own machine → · All 71 devices, with every size →

02

Or rent it from someone else

Cheapest published offer

Cheapest of 2 live listings. Picked at the widest standard context we hold, within one quantisation slice, so the numbers beside it are a price one host actually charges.

per 1M tokens
$0.35 in / $0.56 out
Context served
128K
Throughput
Not measured
Current provider offers with price, context and prompt-privacy answers
ProviderIn / out per 1M tokensContextThroughputTrains on promptsLogs promptsZero retention
OpenRouter$0.35 / $0.56128Knot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown
Cloudflare Workers AI$0.35 / $0.56128K43 tok/sNoYesunknown periodUnknown

Across the 2 listings we hold: 1 say they do not train on prompts, 0 say they do and 1 do not say. 0 appear in the zero-retention registry we check; the rest are unknown to us rather than confirmed either way.

What each host's API supports

From the parameter list each endpoint publishes. Streaming is omitted: nothing we hold reports it, for any model.

Supported
Not supported
Not published
host gave no parameter list
API features per host
ProviderTool callingJSON outputStrict schema
OpenRouter
Cloudflare Workers AI

Tool calling: 0 of 2 listings say yes, 2 say no. JSON output: 0 of 2 listings say yes, 2 say no. Strict schema: 0 of 2 listings say yes, 2 say no.

03

Models people weigh against Mistral Small 3.1 24B

04

When we formed this view

Dates behind this page

Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1361.8 on Arena Codingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1271.1 on Arena Creative Writingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1319 on Arena Hard Promptsleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1295.2 on Arena Instruction Followingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1277.9 on Arena Mathsleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1303.4 on Arena Text (overall)leaderboard
Jul 26, 2026ListedListed on LLMapfirst indexed by our pipeline
Mar 11, 2025AnnouncedMistral Small 3.1 24B announced by Mistral AI

Prices last checked 4d ago

What we do not know about this model yet

  • We hold no measured file for it, so all 3 sizes on this page are calculated from the parameter count.
  • Nothing we hold says whether an endpoint streams, so we do not show it either way.
  • 1 of 2 listings do not say whether they train on prompts.
  • We hold no cached-input rate for any of its listings.
05

Licence and identifiers

What the licence allowsApache License 2.0, what it allows commercially, and the identifiers you need to pull this model — its Hugging Face repo, our slug and a machine-readable card.

Licence

Apache License 2.0

permissiveCommercial use allowed

Fully permissive: commercial use, redistribution, and derivatives allowed. Requires attribution and a copy of the license. Includes an express patent grant.

Identifiers

Architecture
Dense
Modality record
text+image->text
Catalogue slug
mistralai-mistral-small-3-1-24b

Machine-readable model card (omc.json) →

Something wrong on this page? Tell us