Models / Mistral AI/ Mixtral 8x22B Instruct

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct

Mistral AI · released Apr 16, 2024 · mistralai/Mixtral-8x22B-Instruct-v0.1

Input: text and documents. Output: text.InputOutput
Type
Open weightsApache License 2.0
Params
141B
Context
66K

39B active per word · about 49K words of context

Our take

Written Aug 3, 2026

Mixtral is a large downloadable text model from Mistral AI that uses a mixture-of-experts design, keeping 39 billion parameters active per word out of 140.6 billion total. Released in 2024 under a permissive Apache licence, it handles document-scale requests up to 65,536 tokens but scores near the bottom of the leaderboards we track for knowledge and reasoning.

Who should pick it

Pick this when you need a permissive licence for self-hosting or redistribution, or for long-context document work where 65,536 tokens is enough. Use it if you want identical pricing across the two providers that carry it, with no arbitrage hunting needed. Skip it if you need strong graduate-level reasoning, competitive instruction-following scores, or any price competition between hosts.

The case for it

  • Apache 2.0 licence allows commercial use, fine-tuning and redistribution without restriction.
  • 65,536-token request limit supports document-scale text work.
  • Identical pricing across both tracked providers removes arbitrage friction.

The case against it

  • Academic benchmark scores lag on knowledge and reasoning: MMLU-Pro at 38.7% and GPQA Diamond at 16.4%, both near or below random-guess territory on graduate-level material.
  • Arena Elo scores place it in the lower tier of rated instruction-following models, with its lowest category score in instruction following itself.
  • No price competition between its only two hosts, both listing the same rate.
00

How good is it?

IntelligencePuzzles, maths, exam questions

1 of 5

Arena Text (overall)139th of 143 · 1229

Arena Hard Prompts 139th of 143Arena Maths 133rd of 139GPQA Diamond 4th of 16MMLU-Pro 8th of 16

CodingWriting and fixing code on its own

1 of 5

Arena Coding138th of 143 · 1276.9

Arena Coding is the only board that has scored it for this.

AgenticPlanning, calling tools, staying on task

not measured

Nobody we watch has scored Mixtral 8x22B Instruct for this. We would take the rating from Arena Agent (IPS).

WritingWe do not rate this

Scored, not ratedThe placings are on the right.

Two boards come close and neither tests writing: Arena Creative Writing asks people which of two replies they prefer, and LiveBench Language tests whether a model understood a passage. So we show where Mixtral 8x22B Instruct placed and give it no mark out of five.

Arena Creative Writing 139th of 143 · 1190.1
Also scored, on boards we give no mark for
Arena Instruction Following 139th of 143IFEval 11th of 16

These tests check whether a model follows instructions — a precondition for all the work above, but not a measure of how well that work is done, which is why they get no rating.

Every published score for this model9 scoresEvery figure we hold, from 9 boards, with who ran it and a link to the source — including the boards no rating above is built on.
GPQA Diamondreasoning
16.4independentsource ↗
IFEvalchat
71.8independentsource ↗
1276.9independentsource ↗
1242.9independentsource ↗
1227.9independentsource ↗
MMLU-Proreasoning
38.7independentsource ↗
01

Can you run it yourself?

Fits in memory
weights load entirely on the card
Spills to system RAM
some weights offload; much slower
Too large
will not load even with offload
est
size is calculated; the verdict could change by 10%
A card many people ownToo large

GeForce RTX 4090 · 24 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M88.7 / 24 GBest
Usable contextNot calculated for spilled setups
Decode speedNot estimated for spilled setups

Too large for this card. The weights do not fit even with part of them offloaded to system memory.

One step upToo large

Apple M1 Pro (16-core GPU) · 32 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M88.7 / 32 GBest
Usable contextNot calculated for spilled setups
Decode speedNot estimated for spilled setups

Too large for this card. The weights do not fit even with part of them offloaded to system memory.

On a MacFits in memoryest

Apple M1 Ultra (64-core GPU) · 128 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M88.7 / 128 GBest
Spare memory3 GB spare
Usable context8K of 66K
Decode speed20 tok/sest

Borderline fit on an estimated size. It leaves 3 GB spare on a size we calculated rather than measured, and a 10% error either way would change the answer.

Your hardware
Checking your profile…

Memory use by level

Against a 24 GB card.

Q4_K_M
recommended
88.7 GBest
Too large
Q5_K_M
104 GBest
Too large
Q8_0
155.4 GBest
Too large

All 3 sizes here are calculated, not measured. We hold no measured file for this model, so each size comes from the parameter count and every verdict above inherits that uncertainty.

Check against your own machine → · All 71 devices, with every size →

02

Or rent it from someone else

Cheapest published offer

Cheapest of 2 live listings. Picked at the widest standard context we hold, within one quantisation slice, so the numbers beside it are a price one host actually charges.

per 1M tokens
$2.00 in / $6.00 out
Context served
66K
Throughput
Not measured
Current provider offers with price, context and prompt-privacy answers
ProviderIn / out per 1M tokensContextThroughputTrains on promptsLogs promptsZero retention
OpenRouter$2.00 / $6.0066Knot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown
Mistral AI$2.00 / $6.0066K97 tok/sNoYes30 daysUnknown

Across the 2 listings we hold: 1 say they do not train on prompts, 0 say they do and 1 do not say. 0 appear in the zero-retention registry we check; the rest are unknown to us rather than confirmed either way.

What each host's API supports

From the parameter list each endpoint publishes. Streaming is omitted: nothing we hold reports it, for any model.

Supported
Not supported
Not published
host gave no parameter list
API features per host
ProviderTool callingJSON outputStrict schema
OpenRouter
Mistral AI

Tool calling: 2 of 2 listings say yes. JSON output: 2 of 2 listings say yes. Strict schema: 2 of 2 listings say yes.

03

When we formed this view

Dates behind this page

Aug 3, 2026BenchmarkScored 16.4 on GPQA Diamondleaderboard
Aug 3, 2026BenchmarkScored 71.8 on IFEvalleaderboard
Aug 3, 2026BenchmarkScored 38.7 on MMLU-Proleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1276.9 on Arena Codingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1190.1 on Arena Creative Writingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1242.9 on Arena Hard Promptsleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1214.2 on Arena Instruction Followingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1227.9 on Arena Mathsleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1229 on Arena Text (overall)leaderboard
Jul 26, 2026ListedListed on LLMapfirst indexed by our pipeline

Prices last checked 4d ago

What we do not know about this model yet

  • We hold no measured file for it, so all 3 sizes on this page are calculated from the parameter count.
  • Nothing we hold says whether an endpoint streams, so we do not show it either way.
  • 1 of 2 listings do not say whether they train on prompts.
04

Licence and identifiers

What the licence allowsApache License 2.0, what it allows commercially, and the identifiers you need to pull this model — its Hugging Face repo, our slug and a machine-readable card.

Licence

Apache License 2.0

permissiveCommercial use allowed

Fully permissive: commercial use, redistribution, and derivatives allowed. Requires attribution and a copy of the license. Includes an express patent grant.

Identifiers

Architecture
Mixture of experts
Modality record
text+file->text
Catalogue slug
mistralai-mixtral-8x22b-instruct

Machine-readable model card (omc.json) →

Something wrong on this page? Tell us