Models / Moonshot AI/ Kimi K2 Thinking

Kimi K2 Thinking

Moonshot AI · released Nov 4, 2025 · moonshotai/Kimi-K2-Thinking

Input: text. Output: text.InputOutput
Type
Open weightsCustom licence
Params
1.1T
Context
262K

32B active per word · about 197K words of context · download allowed, licence restricts use

Our take

Written Jul 31, 2026

Moonshot AI's Kimi K2.5 is a large mixture-of-experts reasoning model with 32 billion active parameters drawn from over one trillion total. It excels at coding and mathematics, with measured leaderboard scores placing it well ahead of its own general chat and creative writing performance.

Who should pick it

Choose this for coding or mathematical reasoning tasks where its measured scores lead its own benchmark suite. Use it for long-context text work at up to 262,144 tokens, or when you need mixture-of-experts efficiency. Skip it if you need multimodal input, a standard permissive licence, or strong creative writing.

The case for it

  • Strongest measured skill is coding — 51.7 points above its overall text score on the same leaderboard.
  • Mathematical reasoning outperforms general chat and creative writing by 21.9 and 47.8 points respectively.
  • Over one trillion total parameters with only 32 billion active per token, a 33.1× compression ratio.
  • Identical pricing across all four tracked offers, so provider choice comes down to throughput rather than cost.

The case against it

  • Creative writing is the weakest of its six measured skills, 77.6 points below its coding score.
  • Custom licence with restrictions — not a standard open licence; terms are undisclosed in our data.
  • Throughput varies sharply by provider: one identical-priced offer is roughly twice as slow as another.
00

How good is it?

IntelligencePuzzles, maths, exam questions

3.5 of 5

Arena Text (overall)35th of 143 · 1450.2via Thinking

Arena Hard Prompts 36th of 143 via ThinkingArena Maths 23rd of 139 via Thinking

CodingWriting and fixing code on its own

3.5 of 5

Arena Coding34th of 143 · 1501.1via Thinking

Arena Code (WebDev) 32nd of 74 via Thinking

AgenticPlanning, calling tools, staying on task

Scored, not ratedSWE-bench Verified · 19th of 39 · 63.4via mini-SWE-agent

Kimi K2 Thinking is not on Arena Agent (IPS), which is where the rating would come from, so there is no rating here. It is on SWE-bench Verified, in 19th of 39 with 63.4.

WritingWe do not rate this

Scored, not ratedThe placings are on the right.

Two boards come close and neither tests writing: Arena Creative Writing asks people which of two replies they prefer, and LiveBench Language tests whether a model understood a passage. So we show where Kimi K2 Thinking placed and give it no mark out of five.

Arena Creative Writing 35th of 143 · 1423.3 via Thinking
Also scored, on boards we give no mark for
Arena Instruction Following 39th of 143 via Thinking

These tests check whether a model follows instructions — a precondition for all the work above, but not a measure of how well that work is done, which is why they get no rating.

Every published score for this model8 scoresEvery figure we hold, from 8 boards, with who ran it and a link to the source — including the boards no rating above is built on.
1501.1via Thinkingindependentsource ↗
1423.3via Thinkingindependentsource ↗
1471.7via Thinkingindependentsource ↗
1438.8via Thinkingindependentsource ↗
1469.9via Thinkingindependentsource ↗
1450.2via Thinkingindependentsource ↗
1435.8via Thinkingindependentsource ↗
63.4via mini-SWE-agentindependentsource ↗
01

Can you run it yourself?

Fits in memory
weights load entirely on the card
Spills to system RAM
some weights offload; much slower
Too large
will not load even with offload
est
size is calculated; the verdict could change by 10%
A card many people ownToo large

GeForce RTX 4090 · 24 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M667.1 / 24 GBest
Usable contextNot calculated for spilled setups
Decode speedNot estimated for spilled setups

Too large for this card. The weights do not fit even with part of them offloaded to system memory.

One step upToo large

Apple M1 Pro (16-core GPU) · 32 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M667.1 / 32 GBest
Usable contextNot calculated for spilled setups
Decode speedNot estimated for spilled setups

Too large for this card. The weights do not fit even with part of them offloaded to system memory.

One step downToo large

Radeon RX 7900 XT · 20 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M667.1 / 20 GBest
Usable contextNot calculated for spilled setups
Decode speedNot estimated for spilled setups

Too large for this card. The weights do not fit even with part of them offloaded to system memory.

Your hardware
Checking your profile…

Memory use by level

Against a 24 GB card.

Q4_K_M
recommended
667.1 GBest
Too large
Q5_K_M
782.7 GBest
Too large
Q8_0
1169.2 GBest
Too large

All 3 sizes here are calculated, not measured. We hold no measured file for this model, so each size comes from the parameter count and every verdict above inherits that uncertainty.

Check against your own machine → · All 71 devices, with every size →

02

Or rent it from someone else

Cheapest published offer

Cheapest of 4 live listings. Picked at the widest standard context we hold, within one quantisation slice, so the numbers beside it are a price one host actually charges.

per 1M tokens
$0.60 in / $2.50 out
Context served
262K
Throughput
Not measured
Current provider offers with price, context and prompt-privacy answers
ProviderIn / out per 1M tokensContextThroughputTrains on promptsLogs promptsZero retention
OpenRouter$0.60 / $2.50262Knot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown
Novita AI$0.60 / $2.50262Knot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown
Novita AIbf16$0.60 / $2.50262K32 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Google Vertex AI$0.60 / $2.50262K24 tok/sNoNoConfirmed

Across the 4 listings we hold: 2 say they do not train on prompts, 0 say they do and 2 do not say. 2 appear in the zero-retention registry we check; the rest are unknown to us rather than confirmed either way.

What each host's API supports

From the parameter list each endpoint publishes. Streaming is omitted: nothing we hold reports it, for any model.

Supported
Not supported
Not published
host gave no parameter list
API features per host
ProviderTool callingJSON outputStrict schema
OpenRouter
Novita AI
Novita AIbf16
Google Vertex AI

Tool calling: 3 of 4 listings say yes, 1 publishes no parameter list. JSON output: 3 of 4 listings say yes, 1 publishes no parameter list. Strict schema: 3 of 4 listings say yes, 1 publishes no parameter list.

03

When we formed this view

Dates behind this page

Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1501.1 via Thinking on Arena Codingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1423.3 via Thinking on Arena Creative Writingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1471.7 via Thinking on Arena Hard Promptsleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1438.8 via Thinking on Arena Instruction Followingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1469.9 via Thinking on Arena Mathsleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1450.2 via Thinking on Arena Text (overall)leaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1435.8 via Thinking on Arena Code (WebDev)leaderboard
Jul 27, 2026Benchmark updatekimi-k2.5-thinking enters LMArena at 1450 Elo63897 votes
Jul 26, 2026ListedListed on LLMapfirst indexed by our pipeline
Dec 10, 2025BenchmarkScored 63.4 via mini-SWE-agent on SWE-bench Verifiedleaderboard

Prices last checked 35h ago

What we do not know about this model yet

  • We hold no measured file for it, so all 3 sizes on this page are calculated from the parameter count.
  • 1 of 4 listings publish no parameter list, so what their API accepts is unknown to us.
  • Nothing we hold says whether an endpoint streams, so we do not show it either way.
  • 2 of 4 listings do not say whether they train on prompts.
04

Licence and identifiers

What the licence allowsCustom licence, what it allows commercially, and the identifiers you need to pull this model — its Hugging Face repo, our slug and a machine-readable card.

Licence

Custom licence

restricted_openCustom licence — review the terms

This model ships custom license terms that don't map to a known template. We haven't parsed them, so commercial use, redistribution and derivatives are unverified — review the original terms before shipping.

Identifiers

Architecture
Mixture of experts
Modality record
text->text
Catalogue slug
moonshotai-kimi-k2-thinking

Machine-readable model card (omc.json) →

Something wrong on this page? Tell us