Models / Qwen/ Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Qwen · released Apr 15, 2026 · Qwen/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

Input: text, images and video. Output: text.InputOutput
Type
Open weightsApache License 2.0
Params
36B
Context
262K

3B active per word · about 197K words of context

Our take

Written Aug 3, 2026

Qwen 3.6 is a downloadable mixture-of-experts model with only 3 billion active parameters for each token it processes, drawn from 36 billion total. It handles text, images and video across a 262,144-token working window, though no independent quality scores are available yet.

Who should pick it

Choose this for edge or local deployment where low active-parameter overhead matters, or for long-context tasks that need a quarter-million tokens of working memory. It suits budget-conscious hosted use with several providers to pick from. Skip it if you need verified quality benchmarks to compare against peers, or if you want predictable output pricing and throughput across hosts.

The case for it

  • Only 3 billion parameters are active per token from 36 billion total — a 12:1 ratio that keeps inference lean.
  • Apache 2.0 licence allows commercial use, fine-tuning and redistribution without restriction.
  • 262,144-token working window is large for its active-parameter class.
  • Ten hosted offers with strong peak throughput: CoreWeave reaches 166 tokens per second, Venice 138, Atlas Cloud 120.

The case against it

  • No benchmark scores in our data — no Elo, MMLU or other verified quality measures to judge it by.
  • Output pricing varies sharply across providers, with a 1.56× spread between cheapest and most expensive for the identical model.
  • Throughput is highly inconsistent: 27 tokens per second at one provider versus 166 at another, and three providers do not disclose speed at all.
00

How good is it?

We hold no score for this model.

We look for every model we track on every board we watch, and none of them has turned up Qwen3.6 35B A3B — so there is no intelligence, coding, agentic or writing score to show you, not a low one, none.

The boards we watch →

01

Can you run it yourself?

Fits in memory
weights load entirely on the card
Spills to system RAM
some weights offload; much slower
Too large
will not load even with offload
est
size is calculated; the verdict could change by 10%
A card many people ownSpills to system RAMest

GeForce RTX 4090 · 24 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M22.7 / 24 GBest
Usable contextNot calculated for spilled setups
Decode speedNot estimated for spilled setups

Loads, but do not expect an assistant. Some of the weights sit in ordinary system memory, which is far slower than the card.

Comfortable fit

One step upFits in memory

GeForce RTX 5090 · 32 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M22.7 / 32 GBest
Spare memory6.1 GB spare
Usable context66K of 262K
Decode speed670 tok/sest

Room to spare. 6.1 GB spare means a 10% error in the size would not change the answer.

On a MacFits in memoryest

Apple M3 Pro (18-core GPU) · 36 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M22.7 / 36 GBest
Spare memory2.3 GB spare
Usable context16K of 262K
Decode speed49 tok/sest

Borderline fit on an estimated size. It leaves 2.3 GB spare on a size we calculated rather than measured, and a 10% error either way would change the answer.

Your hardware
Checking your profile…

Memory use by level

Against a 24 GB card.

Q4_K_M
recommended
22.7 GBest
Spills to system RAMest
Q5_K_M
26.6 GBest
Spills to system RAM
Q8_0
39.8 GBest
Too large

All 3 sizes here are calculated, not measured. We hold no measured file for this model, so each size comes from the parameter count and every verdict above inherits that uncertainty.

Check against your own machine → · All 71 devices, with every size →

02

Or rent it from someone else

Cheapest published offer

Cheapest of 12 live listings. Picked at the widest standard context we hold, within one quantisation slice, so the numbers beside it are a price one host actually charges.

per 1M tokens
$0.14 in / $1.00 out
Context served
262K
Throughput
Not measured
Current provider offers with price, context and prompt-privacy answers
ProviderIn / out per 1M tokensContextThroughputTrains on promptsLogs promptsZero retention
Venice AIfp8$0.098 / $0.95256K223 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
DeepInfrafp8$0.10 / $0.95262Knot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown
DeepInfrafp8$0.10 / $0.95262K28 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
OpenRouter$0.14 / $1.00262Knot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown
Parasailfp8$0.15 / $1.00262K43 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
AkashMLfp8$0.14 / $1.00262K28 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
AtlasCloudfp8$0.19 / $1.11262K98 tok/sNoYesunknown periodUnknown
CoreWeavefp8$0.25 / $1.25262K190 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Phala$0.20 / $1.27262K29 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Novita AI$0.25 / $1.49262Knot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown
SiliconFlowfp8$0.20 / $1.60262K42 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Io Netfp8$0.29 / $1.89262K153 tok/sNoNoConfirmed

Across the 12 listings we hold: 9 say they do not train on prompts, 0 say they do and 3 do not say. 8 appear in the zero-retention registry we check; the rest are unknown to us rather than confirmed either way.

What each host's API supports

From the parameter list each endpoint publishes. Streaming is omitted: nothing we hold reports it, for any model.

Supported
Not supported
Not published
host gave no parameter list
API features per host
ProviderTool callingJSON outputStrict schema
Venice AIfp8
DeepInfrafp8
DeepInfrafp8
OpenRouter
Parasailfp8
AkashMLfp8
AtlasCloudfp8
CoreWeavefp8
Phala
Novita AI
SiliconFlowfp8
Io Netfp8

Tool calling: 8 of 12 listings say yes, 2 say no, 2 publish no parameter list. JSON output: 7 of 12 listings say yes, 3 say no, 2 publish no parameter list. Strict schema: 7 of 12 listings say yes, 3 say no, 2 publish no parameter list.

03

Models people weigh against Qwen3.6 35B A3B

04

When we formed this view

Dates behind this page

Aug 3, 2026Price changeQwen3.6 35B A3B cut across 2 hosts, by up to 5% at VeniceQwen3.6 35B A3B moved on 2 hosts: Venice: input −2% ($0.10 → $0.098 per 1M tokens); output −5% ($1.00 → $0.95 per 1M tokens); Io Net: input −11% ($0.32 → $0.29 per 1M tokens); output −10% ($2.09 → $1.89 per 1M tokens); cache read −32% ($0.16 → $0.11 per 1M tokens)
Aug 1, 2026Price changeIo Net raised Qwen3.6 35B A3B pricing by 72%input +48% ($0.22 → $0.32 per 1M tokens); output +72% ($1.22 → $2.09 per 1M tokens)
Jul 30, 2026Price changeDeepInfra cut Qwen3.6 35B A3B pricing by 33%input −33% ($0.15 → $0.10 per 1M tokens)
Jul 28, 2026Price changevenice repriced qwen/qwen3.6-35b-a3binput $0.15 → $0.1, output $1 → $1 per 1M tokens
Jul 26, 2026ListedListed on LLMapfirst indexed by our pipeline
Apr 15, 2026AnnouncedQwen3.6 35B A3B announced by Qwen

Prices last checked 13h ago

What we do not know about this model yet

  • We hold no measured file for it, so all 3 sizes on this page are calculated from the parameter count.
  • No board we watch has turned up a score, so we hold no quality figures at all.
  • 2 of 12 listings publish no parameter list, so what their API accepts is unknown to us.
  • Nothing we hold says whether an endpoint streams, so we do not show it either way.
  • 3 of 12 listings do not say whether they train on prompts.
05

Licence and identifiers

What the licence allowsApache License 2.0, what it allows commercially, and the identifiers you need to pull this model — its Hugging Face repo, our slug and a machine-readable card.

Licence

Apache License 2.0

permissiveCommercial use allowed

Fully permissive: commercial use, redistribution, and derivatives allowed. Requires attribution and a copy of the license. Includes an express patent grant.

Identifiers

Architecture
Mixture of experts
Modality record
text+image+video->text
Catalogue slug
qwen-qwen3-6-35b-a3b

Machine-readable model card (omc.json) →

Something wrong on this page? Tell us