Qwen3.7 Plus
Qwen · released Jun 3, 2026
- Type
- Proprietary
- Input
- None held
- Output
- None held
- Cached
- None held
We don't hold a list price for this model yet · hosted only — we hold no downloadable copy
Our take
Written Aug 2, 2026Qwen 3.7 is a proprietary text-and-image model from Alibaba with a one-million-token request limit and measured coding strength. Its pricing is consistent across the three hosts we track, though creative writing and agentic tasks lag within its own benchmark suite.
Choose this for long-document analysis at one million tokens when the cost is acceptable, or for coding tasks where it scores highest in its own Arena suite. It also suits multimodal text-and-image workflows via Alibaba or OpenRouter. Skip it if you need strong creative writing, reliable agentic behaviour, or certainty about which Alibaba throughput tier to pick.
The case for it
- One-million-token request limit — the widest context figure given for this model.
- Strongest measured skill is coding within its own benchmark suite, with a 75.5-point Elo gap over its own creative writing score.
- Consistent pricing across providers, with the same rate on both OpenRouter and Alibaba.
The case against it
- Agentic capability shows negative IPS scores across two evaluations, with volatility between them.
- Creative writing lags its own other skills by a wide margin within the same benchmark suite.
- Throughput is uncertain on one channel, and Alibaba offers two tiers with no guidance on selection.
How good is it?
IntelligencePuzzles, maths, exam questions
Arena Text (overall)27th of 143 · 1459.4
CodingWriting and fixing code on its own
Arena Coding23rd of 143 · 1509.2
Arena Coding is the only board that has scored it for this.
AgenticPlanning, calling tools, staying on task
Arena Agent (IPS)26th of 36 · −0.016
Arena Agent (IPS) is the only board that has scored it for this.
WritingWe do not rate this
Two boards come close and neither tests writing: Arena Creative Writing asks people which of two replies they prefer, and LiveBench Language tests whether a model understood a passage. So we show where Qwen3.7 Plus placed and give it no mark out of five.
These tests check whether a model follows instructions — a precondition for all the work above, but not a measure of how well that work is done, which is why they get no rating.
Every published score for this model7 scoresEvery figure we hold, from 7 boards, with who ran it and a link to the source — including the boards no rating above is built on.
Or rent it from someone else
Cheapest of 3 live listings. Picked at the widest standard context we hold, within one quantisation slice, so the numbers beside it are a price one host actually charges.
- per 1M tokens
- $0.32 in / $1.28 out
- Context served
- 1M
- Throughput
- Not measured
| Provider | In / out per 1M tokens | Context | Throughput | Trains on prompts | Logs prompts | Zero retention |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpenRouter | $0.32 / $1.28 | 1M | not measured | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown |
| Alibaba Cloudfp8 | $0.32 / $1.28 | 1M | 11 tok/s | No | Yesunknown period | Unknown |
| Alibaba Cloud | $0.32 / $1.28 | 1M | 14 tok/s | No | Yesunknown period | Unknown |
Across the 3 listings we hold: 2 say they do not train on prompts, 0 say they do and 1 do not say. 0 appear in the zero-retention registry we check; the rest are unknown to us rather than confirmed either way.
What each host's API supports
From the parameter list each endpoint publishes. Streaming is omitted: nothing we hold reports it, for any model.
- ✓
- Supported
- ✗
- Not supported
- Not published
- host gave no parameter list
| Provider | Tool calling | JSON output | Strict schema |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpenRouter | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Alibaba Cloudfp8 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Alibaba Cloud | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Tool calling: 3 of 3 listings say yes. JSON output: 3 of 3 listings say yes. Strict schema: 3 of 3 listings say yes.
Models people weigh against Qwen3.7 Plus
When we formed this view
Dates behind this page
Prices last checked 9d ago
What we do not know about this model yet
- Nothing we hold says whether an endpoint streams, so we do not show it either way.
- 1 of 3 listings do not say whether they train on prompts.
- We don't hold a list price for this model yet — the gap is ours, not the lab's.
Licence and identifiers
What the licence allowsWe hold no licence record for this model. Inside are the identifiers you need to pull it — its Hugging Face repo where we have one, our slug and a machine-readable card.
Licence
Commercial API terms. We hold no licence record for this model, so there is nothing to summarise here.
Identifiers
- Modality record
- text+image->text
- Catalogue slug
- qwen-qwen3-7-plus