Models / Qwen/ Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Qwen · released Aug 8, 2026 · Qwen/Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B

Input: text. Output: text.InputOutput
Type
Open weightsCustom licence
Params
2.4T
Context
262K

95B active per word · about 197K words of context · download allowed, licence restricts use

Our take

Written Sep 17, 2026

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is a text-in, text-out model you can download and run yourself, and ten hosts serve it at one shared rate. No licence is supplied and no benchmark scores are, so the terms and the quality both need checking before you commit.

Who should pick it

Use it for long-document work where a whole report or a stack of files goes into one request instead of being chunked, and where you are willing to trial it on your own tasks. Because every listed host charges the same rate, choosing between them comes down to speed and reliability rather than price. Skip it if you need a licence you can read before building a commercial product on it, or if you need measured evidence of quality.

The case for it

  • You can download it and run it yourself, so a host is optional and you are not tied to one company's uptime or terms.
  • The request capacity takes a long report or a stack of documents beside the question, though reliable recall across all of it is unverified in our data.
  • All ten listed hosts charge the same rate, so picking between them is a question of speed and reliability, neither of which is measured here.

The case against it

  • No licence is supplied, so whether commercial use, changes and redistribution are permitted is unverified in our data and would need checking at the source.
  • No benchmark scores are supplied, so there is no evidence of coding, reasoning or chat ability and the only way to judge it is a trial on work you can check yourself.
  • The parameter count is not published, so nothing here indicates what running it yourself would require.
00

How good is it?

We hold no score for this model.

So there is no figure here for everyday use, coding, agent work or writing. That is a gap in our data, not a low score.

Where these scores come from →

01

Can you run it yourself?

A card many people ownToo large

GeForce RTX 4090 · 24 GB

Weights at 1542.3 / 24 GBest
Usable contextNot calculated for spilled setups
Decode speedNot estimated for spilled setups

Too large for this card. The weights do not fit even with part of them offloaded to system memory.

One step upToo large

Apple M1 Pro (16-core GPU) · 32 GB

Weights at 1542.3 / 32 GBest
Usable contextNot calculated for spilled setups
Decode speedNot estimated for spilled setups

Too large for this card. The weights do not fit even with part of them offloaded to system memory.

One step downToo large

Radeon RX 7900 XT · 20 GB

Weights at 1542.3 / 20 GBest
Usable contextNot calculated for spilled setups
Decode speedNot estimated for spilled setups

Too large for this card. The weights do not fit even with part of them offloaded to system memory.

Your hardware
Checking your profile…

Memory use by level

Against a 24 GB card.

What is quantisation? →
1542.3 GBest
Too large
1809.5 GBest
Too large
2703.1 GBest
Too large
This model on every device we track71 devicesThe Q4 build most people download, on each device: what the weights come to, how much context the memory leaves, and whether it runs. Smallest device that runs it first.
Apple M3 Ultra (80-core GPU)512 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M2 Ultra (76-core GPU)192 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
B200 (SXM 192GB)192 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Instinct MI300X192 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
H200 141GB SXM141 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M1 Ultra (64-core GPU)128 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M3 Max (40-core GPU)128 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M4 Max (40-core GPU)128 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M5 Max (40-core GPU)128 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
NVIDIA DGX Spark (GB10)128 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (Radeon 8060S)128 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M2 Max (38-core GPU)96 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell96 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
A100 80GB SXM80 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
H100 80GB SXM80 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M1 Max (32-core GPU)64 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M4 Max (32-core GPU)64 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M4 Pro (20-core GPU)64 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M5 Max (32-core GPU)64 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M5 Pro (20-core GPU)64 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
L40S48 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
RTX 6000 Ada48 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M3 Pro (18-core GPU)36 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M1 Pro (16-core GPU)32 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M2 Pro (19-core GPU)32 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M4 (10-core GPU)32 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M5 (10-core GPU)32 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 509032 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M2 (10-core GPU)24 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M3 (10-core GPU)24 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 309024 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti24 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 409024 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Radeon RX 7900 XTX24 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Radeon RX 7900 XT20 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M1 (8-core GPU)16 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB16 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER16 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER16 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB16 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti16 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 508016 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Radeon RX 907016 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Radeon RX 9070 XT16 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Arc B58012 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 3060 12GB12 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER12 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 507012 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Arc B57010 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 3080 10GB10 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Android phone · 16 GB · 2024 or newer8 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M1 (8-core GPU, 8GB unified)8 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M2 (8-core GPU, 8GB unified)8 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 3060 8GB8 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 4060 8GB8 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Radeon RX 66008 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
iPhone 17 Pro6.6 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Android phone · 12 GB · 2023 or newer6 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER6 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
iPhone 15 Pro4.4 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
iPhone 164.4 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
iPhone 16 Pro4.4 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
iPhone 174.4 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Android phone · 8 GB · 2020–20224 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Android phone · 8 GB · 2023 or newer4 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
iPhone 143.3 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
iPhone 153.3 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Android phone · 6 GB3 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
iPhone 132.2 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
iPhone SE (3rd gen)2.2 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Android phone · 4 GB2 GB1542.3 GBestnot calculatedToo large

Check against your own machine → · Where to rent it hosted →

02

Or rent it from someone else

Prices checked 2 hours ago — each listing carries its own date.

Cheapest published offer

Cheapest of 8 live listings.

per 1M tokens
$2.00 in / $6.00 out
Context served
1M
Throughput
Not measured
Current provider offers with price, context and prompt-privacy answers
ProviderIn / out per 1M tokensContextThroughputTrains on promptsLogs promptsZero retention
OpenRouterOpenRouter's own listing$2.00 / $6.00checked 2 hours ago1Mnot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown
DeepInfrafp4Direct and through OpenRouter$2.00 / $6.00checked 2 hours ago262K131K max reply through OpenRouter82 tok/sthrough OpenRouterDirectUnknownThrough OpenRouterNoDirectUnknownThrough OpenRouterNoDirectUnknownThrough OpenRouterConfirmed
Novita AIDirect and through OpenRouter$2.00 / $6.00checked 2 hours ago1M131K max reply through OpenRouter33 tok/sthrough OpenRouterDirectUnknownThrough OpenRouterNoDirectUnknownThrough OpenRouterNoDirectUnknownThrough OpenRouterConfirmed
Together AIThrough OpenRouter$2.00 / $6.00checked 2 hours ago1M909K max reply146 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
SiliconFlowfp8Through OpenRouter$2.00 / $6.00checked 2 hours ago1M131K max reply31 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Venice AIThrough OpenRouter$2.00 / $6.00checked 2 hours ago262K66K max reply54 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Alibaba CloudThrough OpenRouter$2.00 / $6.00checked 2 hours ago1M131K max reply42 tok/sNoYesunknown periodUnknown
ModalThrough OpenRouter$2.00 / $6.00checked 2 hours ago1M262K max reply113 tok/sNoNoConfirmed

Across the 8 listings we hold: 7 say they do not train on prompts (2 of them only through OpenRouter), 0 say they do and 1 does not say. 6 appear in the zero-retention registry we check (2 of them only through OpenRouter); the rest are unknown to us.

What each host's API supports

From the parameter list each endpoint publishes. Streaming is omitted: nothing we hold reports it, for any model.

API features per host
ProviderTool callingJSON outputStrict schema
OpenRouterOpenRouter's own listing✓✓✓
DeepInfrafp4Direct and through OpenRouter✓✓✓
Novita AIDirect and through OpenRouter✓✓✓
Together AIThrough OpenRouter✓✓✓
SiliconFlowfp8Through OpenRouter✓✓✓
Venice AIThrough OpenRouter✓✗✗
Alibaba CloudThrough OpenRouter✓✓✓
ModalThrough OpenRouter✓✓✓

Tool calling: 8 of 8 listings say yes. JSON output: 7 of 8 listings say yes, 1 says no. Strict schema: 7 of 8 listings say yes, 1 says no.

03

Models people weigh against Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

04

When we formed this view

Recent changes

Aug 13, 2026Price changeHost DeepInfra raised Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B pricing by 11% on all rates
What movedinput +11% ($1.80 → $2.00 per 1M tokens), output +11% ($5.40 → $6.00 per 1M tokens), cache read +11% ($0.18 → $0.20 per 1M tokens)
Aug 12, 2026ListedListed on LLMap
What movedfirst indexed by our pipeline
Aug 12, 2026ReleaseQwen3.8 2.4T A95B listed
Aug 8, 2026AnnouncedQwen3.8 2.4T A95B announced by Qwen

Each date is the day we first saw the change, or the day the maker announced it.

What we do not know about this model yet

  • We hold no measured file for it, so all 3 sizes on this page are calculated from the parameter count.
  • No independent board has scored it, so we hold no quality figures at all.
  • Nothing we hold says whether an endpoint streams, so we do not show it either way.
  • 1 of 8 listings does not say whether it trains on prompts, and 2 answer only through OpenRouter, not for their own listing.
  • We hold no batch or off-peak rate for any of its listings.
  • We hold a decode speed for it, but no prompt-processing (prefill) figure, so how long the input side of a job takes is unknown to us.
05

Licence and identifiers

What the licence allowsCustom licence, what it allows commercially, and the identifiers you need to pull this model — its Hugging Face repo, our slug and a machine-readable card.

Licence

Custom licence

Open, with restrictionsCustom licence — review the terms

This model ships custom license terms that don't map to a known template. We haven't parsed them, so commercial use, redistribution and derivatives are unverified — review the original terms before shipping.

Identifiers

Architecture
Mixture of experts
Takes in, gives back
Text in, text out
Catalogue slug
qwen-qwen3-8-2-4t-a95b

Machine-readable model card (omc.json) →

Something wrong on this page? Tell us