Models / xAI/ Grok 4.5

Grok 4.5

xAI · released Jul 8, 2026

Input: text, images and documents. Output: text.InputOutput
Type
Proprietary
Input
$2.00
Output
$6.00
Cached
Not published

List price · per 1M tokens · xAI at 500K context · source ↗

Our take

Written Aug 2, 2026

xAI's top-tier chat model placed second on Arena Text, the independent human-preference board, in July 2026. Its output price is lower than typical for the tier, but its request limit is half the size of the one-million-token peers.

Who should pick it

Pick this for chat-quality-sensitive products on a budget. Use it if your context needs fit within 500,000 tokens. Skip it if you need a one-million-token context or multi-cloud hosting.

The case for it

  • A first-tier Arena Text placing (July 2026) at a mid-tier output price.
  • Low base price for the tier.

The case against it

  • 500,000-token request limit, half the size of the one-million-token peers.
  • Only xAI first-party and OpenRouter in our data, so fewer hosting routes than Claude, Gemini or the GPT line.
00

How good is it?

IntelligencePuzzles, maths, exam questions

4 of 5

Arena Text (overall)20th of 143 · 1468.8

Arena Hard Prompts 19th of 143Arena Maths 11th of 139LiveBench Mathematics 12th of 35LiveBench Reasoning 13th of 35LiveBench Data Analysis 17th of 35

CodingWriting and fixing code on its own

4 of 5

Arena Coding15th of 143 · 1519.7

Arena Code (WebDev) 8th of 74LiveBench Coding 33rd of 35

AgenticPlanning, calling tools, staying on task

3 of 5

Arena Agent (IPS)9th of 36 · 0.055

LiveBench Agentic Coding 6th of 35

WritingWe do not rate this

Scored, not ratedThe placings are on the right.

Two boards come close and neither tests writing: Arena Creative Writing asks people which of two replies they prefer, and LiveBench Language tests whether a model understood a passage. So we show where Grok 4.5 placed and give it no mark out of five.

Arena Creative Writing 19th of 143 · 1447.6LiveBench Language 10th of 35 · 82.8
Also scored, on boards we give no mark for
Arena Instruction Following 20th of 143LiveBench Instruction Following 7th of 35LiveBench 11th of 35

These tests check whether a model follows instructions — a precondition for all the work above, but not a measure of how well that work is done, which is why they get no rating.

Every published score for this model16 scoresEvery figure we hold, from 16 boards, with who ran it and a link to the source — including the boards no rating above is built on.
LiveBenchreasoning
75.8independentsource ↗
68.6independentsource ↗
73independentsource ↗
82.8independentsource ↗
87.2independentsource ↗
0.055independentsource ↗
1519.7independentsource ↗
1491.2independentsource ↗
1488.2independentsource ↗
1468.8independentsource ↗
1549.2independentsource ↗
01

Or rent it from someone else

Cheapest published offer

Why this differs from the header. The strip above quotes xAI's own list price. This is the cheapest live offer at the widest standard context we hold, whoever is serving it — a reseller undercutting a lab is ordinary commerce, not an error.

per 1M tokens
$2.00 in / $6.00 out
Context served
500K
Throughput
Not measured
Current provider offers with price, context and prompt-privacy answers
ProviderIn / out per 1M tokensContextThroughputTrains on promptsLogs promptsZero retention
OpenRouter$2.00 / $6.00500Knot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown
xAI$2.00 / $6.00500K500K outnot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown
xAI$2.00 / $6.00500K66 tok/sNoYes30 daysConfirmed
xAIpriority tier$4.00 / $12.00500K74 tok/sNoYes30 daysUnknown

Across the 4 listings we hold: 2 say they do not train on prompts, 0 say they do and 2 do not say. 1 appear in the zero-retention registry we check; the rest are unknown to us rather than confirmed either way.

What each host's API supports

From the parameter list each endpoint publishes. Streaming is omitted: nothing we hold reports it, for any model.

Supported
Not supported
Not published
host gave no parameter list
API features per host
ProviderTool callingJSON outputStrict schema
OpenRouter
xAI
xAI
xAIpriority

Tool calling: 3 of 4 listings say yes, 1 publishes no parameter list. JSON output: 3 of 4 listings say yes, 1 publishes no parameter list. Strict schema: 3 of 4 listings say yes, 1 publishes no parameter list.

02

Models people weigh against Grok 4.5

03

When we formed this view

Dates behind this page

Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1519.7 on Arena Codingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1447.6 on Arena Creative Writingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1491.2 on Arena Hard Promptsleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1463.1 on Arena Instruction Followingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1488.2 on Arena Mathsleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1468.8 on Arena Text (overall)leaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1549.2 on Arena Code (WebDev)leaderboard
Jul 28, 2026BenchmarkScored 0.055 on Arena Agent (IPS)leaderboard
Jul 26, 2026ListedListed on LLMapfirst indexed by our pipeline
Jul 8, 2026AnnouncedGrok 4.5 announced by xAI

Prices last checked 9d ago

What we do not know about this model yet

  • 1 of 4 listings publish no parameter list, so what their API accepts is unknown to us.
  • Nothing we hold says whether an endpoint streams, so we do not show it either way.
  • 2 of 4 listings do not say whether they train on prompts.
04

Licence and identifiers

What the licence allowsWe hold no licence record for this model. Inside are the identifiers you need to pull it — its Hugging Face repo where we have one, our slug and a machine-readable card.

Licence

Commercial API terms. We hold no licence record for this model, so there is nothing to summarise here.

Identifiers

Modality record
text+image+file->text
Catalogue slug
x-ai-grok-4-5

Machine-readable model card (omc.json) →

Something wrong on this page? Tell us