Models / NVIDIA/ Nemotron 3 Ultra

Nemotron 3 Ultra

NVIDIA · released Jun 3, 2026 · nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B-BF16

Input: text. Output: text.InputOutput
Type
Open weightsCustom licence
Params
561B
Context
512K

about 384K words of context · download allowed, licence restricts use

Our take

Written Aug 3, 2026

Nemotron 3 Ultra is a large text-only model from NVIDIA with a 512,288-token request limit and a custom restricted licence. Its measured agent scores sit below zero, so it is a capacity-first choice rather than a quality-first one.

Who should pick it

Pick this for very long documents or extended conversations that need half a million tokens in a single pass, or for high-throughput batch work where you can justify paying more for faster output. Use it if you are already inside the NVIDIA ecosystem and its licence terms are acceptable. Skip it if you need proven agentic performance, a permissive open licence, or any multimodal input.

The case for it

  • 512,288-token request limit — among the largest we track for dense text work.
  • Throughput varies sharply by host: the fastest measured offer runs almost three times quicker than the slowest.
  • Lowest price in its own offer set is noticeably cheaper than its highest-price option.

The case against it

  • Negative Arena Agent scores on both measured dates, firmly below the higher-is-better zero line.
  • Active parameter count is undisclosed, so true per-token inference cost is unclear.
  • Custom restricted licence, not Apache or MIT — commercial use is constrained by NVIDIA's terms.
00

How good is it?

IntelligencePuzzles, maths, exam questions

not measured

Nobody we watch has scored Nemotron 3 Ultra for this. We would take the rating from Arena Text (overall).

CodingWriting and fixing code on its own

not measured

Nobody we watch has scored Nemotron 3 Ultra for this. We would take the rating from Arena Coding.

AgenticPlanning, calling tools, staying on task

1 of 5

Arena Agent (IPS)34th of 36 · −0.131

Arena Agent (IPS) is the only board that has scored it for this.

WritingWe do not rate this

not measured

Nobody we watch has scored this model for writing. Two boards come close and neither tests writing: Arena Creative Writing asks people which of two replies they prefer, and LiveBench Language tests whether a model understood a passage.

Every published score for this model1 scoreEvery figure we hold, from 1 board, with who ran it and a link to the source — including the boards no rating above is built on.
−0.131independentsource ↗
01

Can you run it yourself?

Fits in memory
weights load entirely on the card
Spills to system RAM
some weights offload; much slower
Too large
will not load even with offload
est
size is calculated; the verdict could change by 10%
A card many people ownToo large

GeForce RTX 4090 · 24 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M353.4 / 24 GBest
Usable contextNot calculated for spilled setups
Decode speedNot estimated for spilled setups

Too large for this card. The weights do not fit even with part of them offloaded to system memory.

One step upToo large

Apple M1 Pro (16-core GPU) · 32 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M353.4 / 32 GBest
Usable contextNot calculated for spilled setups
Decode speedNot estimated for spilled setups

Too large for this card. The weights do not fit even with part of them offloaded to system memory.

On a MacFits in memoryest

Apple M3 Ultra (80-core GPU) · 512 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M353.4 / 512 GBest
Spare memory17.9 GB spare
Usable context33K of 512K
Decode speed1 tok/sest

Borderline fit on an estimated size. It leaves 17.9 GB spare on a size we calculated rather than measured, and a 10% error either way would change the answer.

Your hardware
Checking your profile…

Memory use by level

Against a 24 GB card.

Q4_K_M
recommended
353.4 GBest
Too large
Q5_K_M
414.6 GBest
Too large
Q8_0
619.4 GBest
Too large

All 3 sizes here are calculated, not measured. We hold no measured file for this model, so each size comes from the parameter count and every verdict above inherits that uncertainty.

Check against your own machine → · All 71 devices, with every size →

02

Or rent it from someone else

Cheapest published offer

Cheapest of 6 live listings. Picked at the widest standard context we hold, within one quantisation slice, so the numbers beside it are a price one host actually charges.

per 1M tokens
$0.50 in / $2.20 out
Context served
512K
Throughput
Not measured
Current provider offers with price, context and prompt-privacy answers
ProviderIn / out per 1M tokensContextThroughputTrains on promptsLogs promptsZero retention
OpenRouter$0.50 / $2.20512Knot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown
DeepInfrafp4$0.50 / $2.20262Knot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown
DeepInfrafp4$0.50 / $2.20262K31 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Basetenfp4$0.60 / $2.40203K126 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Venice AIfp8$0.63 / $3.13256K47 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Together AI$0.60 / $3.60512K87 tok/sNoNoConfirmed

Across the 6 listings we hold: 4 say they do not train on prompts, 0 say they do and 2 do not say. 4 appear in the zero-retention registry we check; the rest are unknown to us rather than confirmed either way.

What each host's API supports

From the parameter list each endpoint publishes. Streaming is omitted: nothing we hold reports it, for any model.

Supported
Not supported
Not published
host gave no parameter list
API features per host
ProviderTool callingJSON outputStrict schema
OpenRouter
DeepInfrafp4
DeepInfrafp4
Basetenfp4
Venice AIfp8
Together AI

Tool calling: 5 of 6 listings say yes, 1 publishes no parameter list. JSON output: 4 of 6 listings say yes, 1 says no, 1 publishes no parameter list. Strict schema: 3 of 6 listings say yes, 2 say no, 1 publishes no parameter list.

03

When we formed this view

Dates behind this page

Jul 28, 2026BenchmarkScored −0.131 on Arena Agent (IPS)leaderboard
Jul 27, 2026Price changeopenrouter repriced nvidia/nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55binput $0.6 → $0.5, output $3.6 → $2.2 per 1M tokens
Jul 26, 2026ListedListed on LLMapfirst indexed by our pipeline
Jun 3, 2026AnnouncedNemotron 3 Ultra announced by NVIDIA

Prices last checked 3d ago

What we do not know about this model yet

  • We hold no measured file for it, so all 3 sizes on this page are calculated from the parameter count.
  • 1 of 6 listings publish no parameter list, so what their API accepts is unknown to us.
  • Nothing we hold says whether an endpoint streams, so we do not show it either way.
  • 2 of 6 listings do not say whether they train on prompts.
04

Licence and identifiers

What the licence allowsCustom licence, what it allows commercially, and the identifiers you need to pull this model — its Hugging Face repo, our slug and a machine-readable card.

Licence

Custom licence

restricted_openCustom licence — review the terms

This model ships custom license terms that don't map to a known template. We haven't parsed them, so commercial use, redistribution and derivatives are unverified — review the original terms before shipping.

Identifiers

Architecture
Mixture of experts
Modality record
text->text
Catalogue slug
nvidia-nemotron-3-ultra

Machine-readable model card (omc.json) →

Something wrong on this page? Tell us