Models / Z.AI/ GLM 4.6V

GLM 4.6V

Z.AI · released Dec 7, 2025 · zai-org/GLM-4.6V

Input: text, images and video. Output: text.InputOutput
Type
Open weightsMIT License
Params
108B
Context
131K

about 98K words of context

Our take

Written Aug 3, 2026

GLM 4.6V is a 108-billion-parameter multimodal model from Z.AI that accepts text, images and video, with a permissive MIT licence and particular strength on coding leaderboards. It handles up to 131,072 tokens in a single request and is available from four hosts.

Who should pick it

Pick this for coding-heavy workloads where its Arena Coding score is the headline, or for open-weights multimodal inference that needs MIT licence flexibility. Use it for long-context work up to 131,072 tokens, or when you want provider choice. Skip it if creative writing quality is the priority, or if you need a measured active parameter count to judge per-token compute costs.

The case for it

  • Strongest measured skill is coding: its Arena Coding Elo is 41.4 points above its own overall text score, and 74.3 points above its creative writing score.
  • Fully permissive MIT licence allows commercial use, modification and redistribution without copyleft requirements.
  • Fastest throughput on the vendor's own infrastructure, at more than double the speed of the next measured host.

The case against it

  • Creative writing lags other Arena categories, sitting 33 points below its overall text score and 74.3 points below its coding score.
  • No measured active parameter count, so the total 107.7 billion may overstate per-token compute if the architecture is sparse or mixture-of-experts.
  • Throughput is unverified on half of listed providers, with no measurement for OpenRouter and one Novita entry.
00

How good is it?

IntelligencePuzzles, maths, exam questions

2 of 5

Arena Text (overall)88th of 143 · 1377.2

Arena Hard Prompts 94th of 143

CodingWriting and fixing code on its own

2.5 of 5

Arena Coding93rd of 143 · 1418.6

Arena Coding is the only board that has scored it for this.

AgenticPlanning, calling tools, staying on task

not measured

Nobody we watch has scored GLM 4.6V for this. We would take the rating from Arena Agent (IPS).

WritingWe do not rate this

Scored, not ratedThe placings are on the right.

Two boards come close and neither tests writing: Arena Creative Writing asks people which of two replies they prefer, and LiveBench Language tests whether a model understood a passage. So we show where GLM 4.6V placed and give it no mark out of five.

Arena Creative Writing 83rd of 143 · 1344.3
Also scored, on boards we give no mark for
Arena Instruction Following 88th of 143

These tests check whether a model follows instructions — a precondition for all the work above, but not a measure of how well that work is done, which is why they get no rating.

Every published score for this model5 scoresEvery figure we hold, from 5 boards, with who ran it and a link to the source — including the boards no rating above is built on.
1418.6independentsource ↗
1382.6independentsource ↗
1377.2independentsource ↗
01

Can you run it yourself?

Fits in memory
weights load entirely on the card
Spills to system RAM
some weights offload; much slower
Too large
will not load even with offload
est
size is calculated; the verdict could change by 10%
A card many people ownToo large

GeForce RTX 4090 · 24 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M67.9 / 24 GBest
Usable contextNot calculated for spilled setups
Decode speedNot estimated for spilled setups

Too large for this card. The weights do not fit even with part of them offloaded to system memory.

One step upToo large

Apple M1 Pro (16-core GPU) · 32 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M67.9 / 32 GBest
Usable contextNot calculated for spilled setups
Decode speedNot estimated for spilled setups

Too large for this card. The weights do not fit even with part of them offloaded to system memory.

On a MacFits in memoryest

Apple M2 Max (38-core GPU) · 96 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M67.9 / 96 GBest
Spare memory0.5 GB spare
Usable context4K of 131K
Decode speed4 tok/sest

Borderline fit on an estimated size. It leaves 0.5 GB spare on a size we calculated rather than measured, and a 10% error either way would change the answer.

Your hardware
Checking your profile…

Memory use by level

Against a 24 GB card.

Q4_K_M
recommended
67.9 GBest
Too large
Q5_K_M
79.7 GBest
Too large
Q8_0
119 GBest
Too large

All 3 sizes here are calculated, not measured. We hold no measured file for this model, so each size comes from the parameter count and every verdict above inherits that uncertainty.

Check against your own machine → · All 71 devices, with every size →

02

Or rent it from someone else

Cheapest published offer

Cheapest of 4 live listings. Picked at the widest standard context we hold, within one quantisation slice, so the numbers beside it are a price one host actually charges.

per 1M tokens
$0.30 in / $0.90 out
Context served
131K
Throughput
Not measured
Current provider offers with price, context and prompt-privacy answers
ProviderIn / out per 1M tokensContextThroughputTrains on promptsLogs promptsZero retention
OpenRouter$0.30 / $0.90131Knot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown
Novita AI$0.30 / $0.90131Knot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown
Novita AIbf16$0.30 / $0.90131K19 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Z.AIfp8$0.30 / $0.90131K34 tok/sNoNoConfirmed

Across the 4 listings we hold: 2 say they do not train on prompts, 0 say they do and 2 do not say. 2 appear in the zero-retention registry we check; the rest are unknown to us rather than confirmed either way.

What each host's API supports

From the parameter list each endpoint publishes. Streaming is omitted: nothing we hold reports it, for any model.

Supported
Not supported
Not published
host gave no parameter list
API features per host
ProviderTool callingJSON outputStrict schema
OpenRouter
Novita AI
Novita AIbf16
Z.AIfp8

Tool calling: 3 of 4 listings say yes, 1 publishes no parameter list. JSON output: 2 of 4 listings say yes, 1 says no, 1 publishes no parameter list. Strict schema: 0 of 4 listings say yes, 3 say no, 1 publishes no parameter list.

03

Models people weigh against GLM 4.6V

04

When we formed this view

Dates behind this page

Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1418.6 on Arena Codingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1344.3 on Arena Creative Writingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1382.6 on Arena Hard Promptsleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1367.2 on Arena Instruction Followingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1377.2 on Arena Text (overall)leaderboard
Jul 26, 2026ListedListed on LLMapfirst indexed by our pipeline
Dec 7, 2025AnnouncedGLM 4.6V announced by Z.AI

Prices last checked 4d ago

What we do not know about this model yet

  • We hold no measured file for it, so all 3 sizes on this page are calculated from the parameter count.
  • 1 of 4 listings publish no parameter list, so what their API accepts is unknown to us.
  • Nothing we hold says whether an endpoint streams, so we do not show it either way.
  • 2 of 4 listings do not say whether they train on prompts.
05

Licence and identifiers

What the licence allowsMIT License, what it allows commercially, and the identifiers you need to pull this model — its Hugging Face repo, our slug and a machine-readable card.

Licence

MIT License

permissiveCommercial use allowed

Fully permissive: do anything with attribution. No patent grant, unlike Apache-2.0.

Identifiers

Hugging Face
zai-org/GLM-4.6V
Architecture
Mixture of experts
Modality record
text+image+video->text
Catalogue slug
z-ai-glm-4-6v

Machine-readable model card (omc.json) →

Something wrong on this page? Tell us